Most People today are pleased to have personal computer or mobile engine. Ok. But I observe and encounter some practical situations about interconnection between software of different companies. Why ? The purpose showed from that companies is the satisfaction of their consumers first. But they encounter competition situations that make a Microsoft or Apple softwares don’t run with the android system to the detriment of the consumers. And vice versa. They argue that their companies have a proprietary system and they don’t do effort to open their system in profit of their clients.
I Observations
I’m born in 1971 and nothing has changed. With my first computer in 1991 - 1992, an IBM PS1, with modem, the problem was the same. Impossible to run a software of an another companies that Microsoft. In my opinion, the problem is their dominant position . They abuse to it. And It’s inherent of the dominant position to give an advantage to the holder. The holder doesn’t make effort to their client, the competition is not fare. Because the competition must be seen in profit of the consumers, the reason why the companies exist, don’t it !
So, the consumers are the hostage of the companies and their dominant position. Don’t forget that the consumers pay the product It’s not free or gratis. The counterpart is normally a global product, full of use. But it’s not in practice. The product that they sell are staled.
The opening ends here.
You have just read the part that poses the problem. That is deliberately where open access stops. The corpus is a personal research project carried on since 1998, and the question has always interested me more than the conclusion.
Want to publish your own articles?
Join the Digital Synapse Exchange community and share your research.