I Definition:

Democracy: a term or idea according to which "democracy," from the ancient Greek dēmokratía, a combination of dêmos, "people" (from the Greek "Plebos" or plebs, the people), aims to "distribute, to divide up," and krátos, "power," "to command," designates a political regime or regime in which "all citizens" participate in political decisions through voting. The agora (a place where the Greeks met to discuss the life of the city), the term "citizen" or "civis" in Latin, is a quality above all else, thus excluding women, slaves, children, and foreigners. etc... We can immediately, therefore, make a modern analogy or political and therefore economic life where are excluded, hehe, women once again, children and slaves (clients, employees, and foreigners), why slaves, one could say, because nowadays, there are no more slaves, right? But beyond the term, it is the condition, like the Shoah, shouldn't we say that the Jews were treated as real modern slaves, I say modern because if man has lived for a very long time on the planet, 60 years is not much since 1939. So, today it is a discriminatory regime (which I compare to slavery, because according to the Larousse, slavery is defined as the fact for a social group to be subjected to an economic and political regime which deprives it of all freedom (today without a passport, nor this identity, no movement), forces it to exercise the most difficult economic functions without any other compensation than housing and food. (In short, the working poor)) that the leaders pass off as an honest regime and that there is no other, which is obviously false (we have supposedly invented democracy, so we can invent something else, just think), let's reason, we invented the democracy, well, before there were what, monarchies, dictatorships, potentates, and other despotic regimes plus tribal regimes. So, we would have invented democracy and then nothing, at its invention, democracy certainly suffered controversies (people said like today but it's normal to get whipped, because I didn't do well, lol). People were also undoubtedly skeptical. They must have heard that: "what mode of government do you want to invent, everything has been tried" at the time I mean. In short, let's start again, it is a political system, a form of government in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Not to be confused with the theory of the separation of powers and the establishment of universal suffrage, which are two of the foundations in any case, of modern democracies, deeply unequal like that of ancient Greece, while all politicians present it as the best alternative, even in China that everyone in the West says that it is rather a dictatorial or authoritarian regime, which is called, hee hee, People's Democracy of China etc...

The opening ends here.

You have just read the part that poses the problem. That is deliberately where open access stops. The corpus is a personal research project carried on since 1998, and the question has always interested me more than the conclusion.

Want to publish your own articles?

Join the Digital Synapse Exchange community and share your research.